Although the benefits — such as increased efficiency, better quality control and risk management — are crystal clear, it appears that many offices still lack centralized and digitized knowledge management today. Remarkable, because how easy would it be to have all your and your colleagues' expertise at hand anytime, anywhere with one click? Instead of explaining the benefits of knowledge management, we take a different tack in this contribution and collect a few suggestions below to completely ignore Knowledge Management (KM) by 2025.
Keep spending time reinventing the wheel
In knowledge-intensive occupations, searching for information can often be time-consuming. Especially when it is available everywhere (but especially nowhere). A well-organized internal knowledge database provides direct access to relevant information, which saves considerable time. This increases productivity and allows employees to spend their time providing valuable insights instead of looking for information or, worse, repeating work that has already been done.
Encourage an island culture instead of a We-land culture
When knowledge is shared centrally, an environment is created in which cooperation and cross-pollination between different teams or disciplines are stimulated. Employees can learn from each other's experiences, which can provide new ideas and insights. Innovation is often driven by combining existing knowledge in new ways. A knowledge database makes it possible to easily access previous ideas, research results and best practices, which in turn can lead to groundbreaking innovations. When central knowledge management is missing, each employee works on their island and (everyone's) expertise is only used by one person.
Throw your intellectual capital out on the street
In many knowledge-intensive organizations, much of the value depends on the intellectual capital of the employees. When an employee leaves, it can result in a loss of valuable knowledge and experience. An internal knowledge database reduces this risk by documenting and sharing knowledge independently of individual employees. This ensures continuity and helps organizations to be better prepared for personnel changes. However, if reinforcing competitors with your firm's expertise is a goal, it seems like a good idea to miss out on knowledge management next year.
Conclusion
Structured knowledge management is a fundamental pillar of organizations that operate in knowledge-oriented sectors. It promotes efficiency, innovation and quality, reduces risks and contributes to the continuity of the organization. However, there are also many arguments for completely ignoring Knowledge Management. If you like pointless reproduction of work, or if your company's intellectual capital is secondary, we can only recommend that you keep doing it!